yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Interpreting change in exponential models: changing units | High School Math | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere increases rapidly as we continue to rely on fossil fuels. The relationship between the elapsed time T in decades—let me highlight that because that's not a typical unit—but in decades since CO2 levels were first measured and the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. So, the amount of CO2 A of D sub T in parts per million is modeled by the following function.

So, the amount of CO2 as a function of how many decades have passed is going to be this. So, T is in decades in this model right over here. Complete the following sentence about the yearly rate of change. The yearly rate of change in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, round your answer to two decimal places.

Every year, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases by a factor of... If they said every decade, well this would be pretty straightforward. Every decade you increase T by one, and so you're going to multiply by 1.06 again. So, every decade you increase by a factor of 1.06. But what about every year?

I always find it helpful to make a bit of a table just so we can really digest things properly. So, I'll say T and I'll say A of T. So when T is equal to zero—so at the beginning of our study—well, 1.06 to the zero power is just going to be one. You have 3155 parts per million.

So, what's a year later? A year later is going to be a tenth of a decade—remember T is in decades—so a year later is 0.1 of a decade. So 0.1 of a decade later, what is going to be the amount of carbon we have? Well, it's going to be 3155 times 1.06 to the 0.1 power. And what is that going to be? Well, let's see.

If we calculate it, 1.06 to the 0.1 power is equal to approximately 1.58. So, this is the same thing as 3155 * 1.58, and I should say approximately equal to... I did a little bit of rounding there. So after another year—now we're at T equals 0.2, we're at 0.2 of a decade—where are we going to be?

We're going to be at 3155 * 1.06 to the 0.2, which is the same thing as 3155 * (1.06 to the 0.1) raised to the 2 power. So we're going to multiply by this 1.06 to the 1/10 power again, or we're going to multiply by 1.58 a second time.

Another way to think about it, if we want to reformulate this model in terms of years, for each year of T, it's going to be 3155. Now, our common ratio wouldn't be 1.06; it'd be 1.06 to the 0.1 power, or approximately 1.58. Then we would raise that; now T would be in years.

Now, here it is in decades, and I could say approximately since this is rounded a little bit. So every year, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases by a factor of... I could say 1.06 to the 0.1 power. But if I'm rounding my answer to two decimal places, well, we're going to increase by 1.58. In fact, they should—they increase by a factor of... I'm guessing they want more than two decimal places. Well, anyway, this right over here is five significant digits, but I'll leave it there.

More Articles

View All
Suhail Doshi - How to Measure Your Product
We are very grateful to have Suhail from Mixpanel, who co-founded Mixpanel almost 10 years ago now and is going to talk about how to measure your product, which, as you heard from Gustav, is really the other side of the coin of growth and everything that …
Re: The Trouble With The Electoral College – Cities, Metro Areas, Elections and The United States
Hello, internet. Let’s talk about this map, this argument, and the Electoral College in general. In my “Trouble With The Electoral College” video from 2011, I was wrong to use the city limits for that part of the argument, rather than the more expansive m…
Why Warren Buffett Says Consumer Behavior Is Key to Investing | Berkshire 2024 (MUST WATCH)
Stefan WB: My name is Stefan WB. I am a shareholder from Hur Hur Germany. My question to Warren: your favorite holding period is forever holding American Express or Coca-Cola for decades. Berkshire recently went in and out of Marquel, and you, uh, I belie…
WARNING: Why Peer To Peer Lending is a BAD INVESTMENT
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So as usual, it’s a Sunday night, I’m at my computer, and instead of watching PewDiePie and Ownage Pranks like any normal person would do, I’m sitting here busy looking into peer-to-peer lending. From doing so, I fou…
Life Unlocks After These 15 Changes
92% of people want change. Every year, 76% of people die with the regret of allowing life to pass them by. Average job. Average home. Average partner. Despite nobody starting off looking for average yet, they still end up there. By the end of this video, …
I found the MOST PROFITABLE Savings Accounts (It’s not Robinhood)
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, after all the popularity revolving around Robinhood’s 3% checking and savings accounts, and all the excitement and hysteria revolving around that, and everybody losing their minds, and also issues with the SIPC,…