yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Interpreting change in exponential models: changing units | High School Math | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere increases rapidly as we continue to rely on fossil fuels. The relationship between the elapsed time T in decades—let me highlight that because that's not a typical unit—but in decades since CO2 levels were first measured and the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. So, the amount of CO2 A of D sub T in parts per million is modeled by the following function.

So, the amount of CO2 as a function of how many decades have passed is going to be this. So, T is in decades in this model right over here. Complete the following sentence about the yearly rate of change. The yearly rate of change in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, round your answer to two decimal places.

Every year, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases by a factor of... If they said every decade, well this would be pretty straightforward. Every decade you increase T by one, and so you're going to multiply by 1.06 again. So, every decade you increase by a factor of 1.06. But what about every year?

I always find it helpful to make a bit of a table just so we can really digest things properly. So, I'll say T and I'll say A of T. So when T is equal to zero—so at the beginning of our study—well, 1.06 to the zero power is just going to be one. You have 3155 parts per million.

So, what's a year later? A year later is going to be a tenth of a decade—remember T is in decades—so a year later is 0.1 of a decade. So 0.1 of a decade later, what is going to be the amount of carbon we have? Well, it's going to be 3155 times 1.06 to the 0.1 power. And what is that going to be? Well, let's see.

If we calculate it, 1.06 to the 0.1 power is equal to approximately 1.58. So, this is the same thing as 3155 * 1.58, and I should say approximately equal to... I did a little bit of rounding there. So after another year—now we're at T equals 0.2, we're at 0.2 of a decade—where are we going to be?

We're going to be at 3155 * 1.06 to the 0.2, which is the same thing as 3155 * (1.06 to the 0.1) raised to the 2 power. So we're going to multiply by this 1.06 to the 1/10 power again, or we're going to multiply by 1.58 a second time.

Another way to think about it, if we want to reformulate this model in terms of years, for each year of T, it's going to be 3155. Now, our common ratio wouldn't be 1.06; it'd be 1.06 to the 0.1 power, or approximately 1.58. Then we would raise that; now T would be in years.

Now, here it is in decades, and I could say approximately since this is rounded a little bit. So every year, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases by a factor of... I could say 1.06 to the 0.1 power. But if I'm rounding my answer to two decimal places, well, we're going to increase by 1.58. In fact, they should—they increase by a factor of... I'm guessing they want more than two decimal places. Well, anyway, this right over here is five significant digits, but I'll leave it there.

More Articles

View All
Pilgrims and Martian Explorers | StarTalk
A common analogy that people like to make is that if you are the first colony on Mars, that’s kind of like the pilgrims coming from Europe to the New World. You know, you’re not going back. So you’ve got your loved ones, your possessions, a competent ship…
Ruchi Sanghvi Speaks at Female Founders Conference 2015
Good afternoon everyone! I’m so excited to be here today. I don’t think I’ve ever spoken to such a large audience of female entrepreneurs and technologists before. This, I think, we need to give ourselves a huge round of applause! Woo! I’m so inspired by …
15 Expensive Things That Are NOT Worth the Money
You dream about becoming rich so you can afford everything you ever wanted, only to find out that you hate having to take care of so many things. Most expensive things are just a clever way to separate rich people from their money. If last Sunday, we look…
Tim Matheson on Playing Ronald Reagan | Killing Reagan
Very rarely is there the perfect man and the perfect job, and we see it in actors and we see it in certain politicians. Here was a man who was born to play that role as President of the United States and was an inspirational leader when the nation really …
Density curve worked example | Modeling data distributions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Consider the density curve below. It’s depicted right over here; it’s a little unusual looking. It looks more like a triangle than our standard density curves, but it’s valid. Which of the following statements are true? Choose all answers that apply: Th…
Molecular variation | Cellular energetics | AP Biology | Khan Academy
We are now going to discuss molecular variation in cells. You’re probably familiar with the idea that you have a variation of genetic makeups in a population. But even within an organism, you have variation in the types of molecules that an organism can p…