yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Interpreting change in exponential models: changing units | High School Math | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere increases rapidly as we continue to rely on fossil fuels. The relationship between the elapsed time T in decades—let me highlight that because that's not a typical unit—but in decades since CO2 levels were first measured and the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. So, the amount of CO2 A of D sub T in parts per million is modeled by the following function.

So, the amount of CO2 as a function of how many decades have passed is going to be this. So, T is in decades in this model right over here. Complete the following sentence about the yearly rate of change. The yearly rate of change in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, round your answer to two decimal places.

Every year, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases by a factor of... If they said every decade, well this would be pretty straightforward. Every decade you increase T by one, and so you're going to multiply by 1.06 again. So, every decade you increase by a factor of 1.06. But what about every year?

I always find it helpful to make a bit of a table just so we can really digest things properly. So, I'll say T and I'll say A of T. So when T is equal to zero—so at the beginning of our study—well, 1.06 to the zero power is just going to be one. You have 3155 parts per million.

So, what's a year later? A year later is going to be a tenth of a decade—remember T is in decades—so a year later is 0.1 of a decade. So 0.1 of a decade later, what is going to be the amount of carbon we have? Well, it's going to be 3155 times 1.06 to the 0.1 power. And what is that going to be? Well, let's see.

If we calculate it, 1.06 to the 0.1 power is equal to approximately 1.58. So, this is the same thing as 3155 * 1.58, and I should say approximately equal to... I did a little bit of rounding there. So after another year—now we're at T equals 0.2, we're at 0.2 of a decade—where are we going to be?

We're going to be at 3155 * 1.06 to the 0.2, which is the same thing as 3155 * (1.06 to the 0.1) raised to the 2 power. So we're going to multiply by this 1.06 to the 1/10 power again, or we're going to multiply by 1.58 a second time.

Another way to think about it, if we want to reformulate this model in terms of years, for each year of T, it's going to be 3155. Now, our common ratio wouldn't be 1.06; it'd be 1.06 to the 0.1 power, or approximately 1.58. Then we would raise that; now T would be in years.

Now, here it is in decades, and I could say approximately since this is rounded a little bit. So every year, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases by a factor of... I could say 1.06 to the 0.1 power. But if I'm rounding my answer to two decimal places, well, we're going to increase by 1.58. In fact, they should—they increase by a factor of... I'm guessing they want more than two decimal places. Well, anyway, this right over here is five significant digits, but I'll leave it there.

More Articles

View All
Stupid Simple Money Rules
Here’s a fact you might not be aware of: the moment you walk out of the door of your apartment, everybody is looking for one thing: to sell you something and take away your money. And make no mistake, if you don’t take great care of your money and make an…
Caught in a mangrove rip tide | Primal Survivor: Extreme African Safari
The current’s already taking me. I can feel it, so I’ll just let it do its thing. Not far down the channel, we spot something. “Look at that! The fish trap!” So that’s obviously the Michikenda. Send it from tribes whose ancient ancestors migrated out of…
8 Ways To Enter The Present Moment
Many spiritual and religious traditions talk about the human tendency to spend too much time outside the present moment. According to a Harvard University study, we spend almost fifty percent of the time we are awake, not thinking about what we are doing.…
Worked example: Using formal charges to evaluate nonequivalent resonance structures | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We’re told that three possible resonance structures for the thiocyanate ion are shown below. All right, there we have them. Based on formal charges, which of the three structures contributes most to the resonance hybrid of thiocyanate? And …
Multiplying fractions by whole numbers word problem | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy
Rishi spent 34s of an hour for 2 days working on his science project. Kyle spent 1⁄4 of an hour for six days working on his science project. Who spent more time on his science project? So we want to know who spent more time. To do that, we need to first …
Turbulent Flow is MORE Awesome Than Laminar Flow
A portion of this video was sponsored by Cottonelle. This is like a scientist trap. It certainly is; case in point, that is Space Station commander Chris Hadfield. What this isn’t is turbulent. Nope, this is largely laminar flow. “Did somebody say peculia…