yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Understanding Simulated Universes | StarTalk


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Now, Brian Green, uh, he's best known to the public for popularizing string theory. His earliest book, "The Elegant Universe," was a mega bestseller back in 1999. It was followed up with a book called "The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality." Now, that touches on so much, and it enables him to think about so many interesting branches of physics that intrigue us.

In 2003, there was a paper published by a philosopher from the University of Oxford on whether or not the universe is a simulation. I had to ask Brian Green if he thought this could actually be possible, just to get a professional opinion on this. Let's find out if it's the case that one day we can have computers that can recreate a reality in bits and bytes that has such veritude that their inhabitants of those simulations feel that it's real.

If that's possible, and I think many of us agree that it might be, we're getting closer already. Just let's assume that's possible. It's so much easier to create a simulation than it is to create a real universe. I mean, how are you going to create a real universe? So if you wait long enough, there are going to be many, many more simulated universes than there are real ones.

So, any sentient being, if they're rational, would think that the odds are that they're in one of those simulations because there are so many more of those compared to real ones. Statistically, you're in the simulated one, not the real one.

Yeah, yeah, exactly. So how do you know? It would be very hard. I mean, some have suggested, sort of like in "The Matrix," to look for glitches. Real universes don't have glitches, but computers can have them. But I say to that glitches, because, uh, presumably a fallible entity programmed that.

It could be that there could also be an electric current glitch that happens in the real universe and screws up what's happening inside the computer. But I don't buy that argument because if it's a really good simulation, it should be able to rewind, erase the memory of a glitch, fix it, and then the simulated beings have no memory of it ever happening.

More Articles

View All
Examples of bias in surveys | Study design | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
We’re told that David hosts a podcast, and he’s curious how much his listeners like his show. He decides to start with an online poll. He asks his listeners to visit his website and participate in the poll. The poll shows that 89 percent of about 200 resp…
Real Estate Tricks: How To Pay Off Your Home Mortgage FAST
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So here’s a really popular topic of discussion when it comes to real estate, and that is how to pay off your mortgage early. With this video, I will tell you exactly how to do this with ninja real estate secrets and t…
The Illegal and Secretive World of Chameleon Ranching | National Geographic
Chameleons have a lot of crazy things going on and are pretty unique in the lizard world. They have these independently rotating googly eyes, this prehensile tail which is basically a monkey tail they can use like a fifth limb, and spring-loaded tongs tha…
The Worst Economic Collapse Is Coming (How To Prepare)
What’s Grandma? It’s guys, hear you. And if it hasn’t already become obvious, the banking system is in deep trouble. Now, I know there’s been a lot of talk about major banks over-leveraging themselves to the point of failure. But as of a few days ago, tw…
Hedge Funds Explained (According to a Hedge Fund Analyst)
Hedge funds, an area of finance that very few people knew much about just a couple of years ago, have started to relatively recently get more attention from the general public. Still, not too much is known about the secretive industry, besides the fact th…
Estimating decimal addition (thousandths) | Adding decimals | Grade 5 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
So we have two questions here, but don’t stress out. Anytime I even see a lot of decimals, I’m like, okay, is this going to be a lot of hairy arithmetic? But what we see here, it does not say what 8.37 + 4926 is equal to. The equal sign is squiggly. That …