yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Understanding Simulated Universes | StarTalk


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Now, Brian Green, uh, he's best known to the public for popularizing string theory. His earliest book, "The Elegant Universe," was a mega bestseller back in 1999. It was followed up with a book called "The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality." Now, that touches on so much, and it enables him to think about so many interesting branches of physics that intrigue us.

In 2003, there was a paper published by a philosopher from the University of Oxford on whether or not the universe is a simulation. I had to ask Brian Green if he thought this could actually be possible, just to get a professional opinion on this. Let's find out if it's the case that one day we can have computers that can recreate a reality in bits and bytes that has such veritude that their inhabitants of those simulations feel that it's real.

If that's possible, and I think many of us agree that it might be, we're getting closer already. Just let's assume that's possible. It's so much easier to create a simulation than it is to create a real universe. I mean, how are you going to create a real universe? So if you wait long enough, there are going to be many, many more simulated universes than there are real ones.

So, any sentient being, if they're rational, would think that the odds are that they're in one of those simulations because there are so many more of those compared to real ones. Statistically, you're in the simulated one, not the real one.

Yeah, yeah, exactly. So how do you know? It would be very hard. I mean, some have suggested, sort of like in "The Matrix," to look for glitches. Real universes don't have glitches, but computers can have them. But I say to that glitches, because, uh, presumably a fallible entity programmed that.

It could be that there could also be an electric current glitch that happens in the real universe and screws up what's happening inside the computer. But I don't buy that argument because if it's a really good simulation, it should be able to rewind, erase the memory of a glitch, fix it, and then the simulated beings have no memory of it ever happening.

More Articles

View All
Making Grilled Cheese at the Bottom of the World: A Day in the Life of a Scientist | Continent 7
My name is Paul. This is lunch in Antarctica. Everyday welcome to the kitchen, sits next to the science disc. I live on cheese toasties, so we make that’s lunch. My puppy here, three or four a day. It’s got a bit of cheese here. You can either use this or…
10 Mental Mistakes That Keep You From Getting Rich
When it comes to getting rich, who do you think is your greatest enemy? We’ll answer that question for you: it is yourself, and you might not even be aware of it. That’s because our own psychology will work against us unless we make an effort to understan…
Aileen Lee and Kirsty Nathoo at the Female Founders Conference
So, I’m Kirsty Nathu. I’m a partner at Y Combinator and also the CFO. And our next speaker is Aileen Lee. Aileen is the founder of Cowboy Ventures, which has a fund that invests in seed-stage companies. Before starting Cowboy, Aileen was at Kleiner Perkin…
"Where Love Is Illegal": Chronicling LGBT Stories of Love and Discrimination (Part 3) | Nat Geo Live
Our activism is continuing to evolve. In the next phase of Where Love Is Illegal, we are enduring to leverage our storytelling skills so we can further amplify the voices of LGBTQI+ communities around the world. And we’re doing just that in Jamaica. Last …
There's no such thing as Universally Preferable Behaviour
Universally preferable behavior is the name of Stefan Malan’s book arguing for an objective non-religious foundation for morality. Uh, I’ll begin by saying I don’t believe that anything that could fairly be called objective morality exists. Uh, so catego…
Why I'm ALWAYS broke by the end of the year…$300,000 gone
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, this is this weird investment strategy and mindset I’ve been practicing since 2011. Now, maybe it’s a little bit weird, and maybe it’s a little bit risky, and maybe it’s a little bit stupid, but this has been wor…