yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger on How to Calculate Future Earnings


2m read
·Nov 12, 2024

I have a question. When you're valuing the companies and you discount back the future earnings, you talked about how many years out you generally go. If you don't go out a general number of years, how do you arrive at that time period?

Well, that's a very good question. It's the heart of investing, or buying businesses, which we regard as the same thing. It is the framework in which we operate. I mean, we are trying to look at businesses in terms of what kind of cash can they produce if we're buying all of them, or will they produce if we're buying part of them, and there's a difference.

Then, at what discount rate do we bring it back? I think your question was how far out do we look and all that. Despite the fact that we can define that in a very kind of simple and direct equation, you know, we haven't actually sat down and written out a set of numbers to relate that equation. We do it in our heads in a way, obviously. I mean, that's what it's all about. But there's no piece of paper, and we never had a piece of paper that shows what our calculation on Helzberg's or See's Candy or the Buffalo News was in that respect.

So, it would be attaching a little more scientific quality to our analysis than there really is if I gave you some gobbledygook about while we do it for 18 years and stick a terminal value on and do all of this. We are sitting in the office thinking about that question with each business or each investment. We have discount rates in a general way in mind, but we really like the decision to be obvious enough to us that it doesn't require making a detailed calculation.

It's the framework, but it's not applied in the sense that we actually fill in all the variables. Is that a fair way of saying it?

Yeah. Berkshire is being run the way Thomas Hunt Morgan, the great Nobel Laureate, ran the biology department at Caltech. He banned the freedom calculator, which was the computer of that era. People said, "How can you do this? Everywhere else in Caltech we have freedom calculators going." He said, "Well, we're picking up these great nuggets of gold just by organized common sense. Resources are short, and we're not going to resort to any damn placer mining as long as we could pick up these major aggregations of gold." That's the way Berkshire works, and I hope the placer mining era will never come.

Somebody once subpoenaed our staffing papers on some acquisition, and of course, not only did we not have any staffing papers, we didn't have any staff.

More Articles

View All
Ask Sal Anything! Homeroom Wednesday, June 24
Hi everyone! Welcome to the homeroom livestream. Today, we’re actually just going to have an Ask Me Anything, so any questions you have for me about anything, I encourage you to put below, whether you’re watching this on Facebook or YouTube. Put this on t…
Connecting income to capital growth and potential inequality | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
We’ve already talked quite a bit about the idea that if you look, you if you have a market capitalist economy that some, that this will lead hopefully to economic growth. Economic growth, but by definition, a market economy will have some folks who win mo…
How to Mountain Bike Like a Pro | Get Out: A Guide to Adventure
Hi, I’m Eric Porter. I’m a professional mountain biker, and I’m going to teach you how to get started with mountain biking. I love mountain biking ‘cause it’s a great way to get away from everything, get out into the woods, ride your bike, challenge your…
Representing dilations algebraically, k less than 1 | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy
We are told quadrilateral WXYZ was dilated with the origin as the center of dilation to create quadrilateral W’ X’ Y’ Z’. So, we started off with this black quadrilateral, and then it looks like it was dilated down. One way to think about it, centered at…
Worked examples for standard algorithm exercise
We’re now going to do a few example questions from the Khan Academy exercise on the standard algorithm. So we’re asked which of the following correctly multiplies 74 times 8 using the standard algorithm. So pause this video and see if you can work on that…
WHACK REBECCA BLACK! .. and more: DONG!
Vsauce. Today on my subway ride into work, I earned the very final star I needed in Angry Birds. But I know what you’re thinking. “Michael, I don’t care. I want things I can do online now, gosh!” DONG. Let’s begin with Leanback. That’s right, there’s a …