yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating mass percent | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So right over here, I have the molecular formula for glucose. And so let's just say that I had a sample of pure glucose right over here. This is my little pile of glucose. I'm not even going to tell you its mass, but based on the molecular formula, can you figure out the percentage of carbon by mass of my sample? Pause this video and think about it. As a hint, I've given you the average atomic masses of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.

All right now, let's work through this together. Now, the reason why the amount of glucose doesn't matter is because the percent carbon by mass should be the same regardless of the amount. But to help us think this through, we can imagine an amount. Let's say, let's say, let's just assume that this is a mole. This is a mole of glucose.

So one way we could think about it is we say, okay, for every mole of glucose, we have six moles of carbon because every glucose molecule has six carbon atoms. So we could say, what is going to be the mass of six moles of carbon divided by the mass of one mole of glucose? And once again, the reason why it's six moles of carbon divided by one mole of glucose is because this, if we assume this is a mole of glucose, every molecule of glucose has six carbons. So it's going to be six times as many carbon atoms or six moles of carbon.

Now, what is this going to be? Well, this is going to be equal to, in our numerator, we're going to have 6 moles of carbon times the molar mass of carbon. Well, what's that going to be? We can get that from the average atomic mass of carbon. If the average atomic mass is 12.01 universal atomic mass units, the molar mass is going to be 12.01 grams per mole of carbon. So times 12.01 grams per mole of carbon.

And notice the numerator will just be left with grams. And then in the denominator, what are we going to have? Well, the mass of one mole of glucose. For every glucose molecule, we have six carbons, 12 hydrogens, and six oxygens. So it's going to be the mass of 6 moles of carbon, 12 moles of hydrogen, and 6 moles of oxygen.

So it's going to be what we just had up here. It's going to be 6 moles of carbon times the molar mass of carbon (12.01 grams per mole of carbon), to that, we are going to add the mass of 12 moles of hydrogen. So, 12 moles of hydrogen times the molar mass of hydrogen, which is going to be 1.008 grams per mole of hydrogen, plus 6 moles of oxygen times the molar mass of oxygen, which is going to be 16.00 grams per mole of oxygen.

And the good thing is down here, the units cancel out, so we're left with just grams in the denominator. That makes sense; we're going to end up with grams in the numerator, grams in the denominator, the units will cancel out, and we'll get a pure percentage at the end.

So let’s see. In the numerator, 6 times 12.01 is 72.06. And then in the denominator, I'm just going to do the pure calculation first, and then I'm going to worry about significant figures. So the denominator, we have 72.06 plus, let's see, 12 times 1.008 is 12.096.

And then we have plus 6 times 16, which is 96.00. This will be equal to 72.06 if we're just thinking about the pure calculation before we think about significant figures. 72.06 divided by, let's see, if I had 72 to 12, I get 84. Plus 96, I get 180.156. Did I do that right? If I were to just add up everything, not even think about significant figures.

So we can type this into a calculator, but we should remind ourselves that our final answer should have no more than four significant figures because, even down here, if we were just doing this blue calculation, that should only have four significant figures. It would have gotten us to the hundreds place, and so when we add things together, we should get no more than the hundredths place.

But even if we rounded over there for significant figures purposes, we would still have at least four. We would actually have five significant figures, so this four significant figures is our significant figures limiting factor.

So we just have to calculate this and round to four significant figures. 72.06 divided by 180 is equal to, and if you round to four significant figures, this will be 0.4000. So this will be, I’ll say, approximately equal to 0.400 or we could say 40 or 40.00 percent carbon by mass when we round to four significant figures and we are done.

More Articles

View All
Fishing Tips: How to Modify Your Rig for Rough Seas | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
My name is Britton, shocking for non-accountants, and owner of The Doghouse. I’m gonna show you one of the things that we do when we’re trolling in rough weather. Here on the Outer Banks, it’s notorious for windy conditions. Patrolling is a big part of w…
Moral realism doesn't help you (much)
Moral nihilism, uh, the belief that moral facts don’t exist, or at least that’s how I’m going to define it here. Lord Hawkeye gives the impression that he does believe the moral facts exist. I’m not certain that he really does. A couple of his remarks abo…
Fishing Tips: How to Troll a Mark | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
Tuna and that market you saw right there is, in fact, a giant bluefin tuna. We’re actually trolling right now; we’re down to the Outer Banks, and we’re fishing with ballyhoos and a green stick deployed. We’ve been marking fish radically throughout the da…
Analyzing mistakes when finding extrema example 2 | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Aaron was asked to find if f of x is equal to x squared minus 1 to the 2⁄3 power has a relative maximum. This is her solution, and then they give us her steps, and at the end, they say, is Aaron’s work correct? If not, what’s her mistake? So pause this vi…
Doc Brown "Loved Himself Some Einstein" | StarTalk
Einstein always kind of, uh, amazes me. And it was he amazes us all, by the way. Yes, yeah, and he was just a clerk in the patent Department. Yeah, nobody knew, you know, but he’s going looking at this, and there’s a railroad station. And he spent a lot …
Charlie Munger: Investing During the 2023 Recession
If you think we might have on and off waves of inflation like we did prior to when Volcker stepped in at the Fed, the 70s era, of course it will happen some in the future. Yes, I think we’ll have some of that in the future. I think more inflation over th…