yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

'Property is theft' stolen concept fallacy


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Property is theft. This is a phrase that unpacks as all property is theft, and it's something that I've seen mentioned a few times on YouTube lately. A comment from one of my subscribers, I think in my previous video, prompted me to address this specifically.

To claim all property is theft is one that we can easily show to be incoherent. A stolen object is not considered the property of the thief; even though it's in his possession, it remains the property of the rightful owner. Theft is when property is taken by someone who has no legitimate title to that property, and this person doesn't have the permission of the rightful owner to take it.

So, the existence of legitimately owned property is conceptually ancestral to the concept of theft. In other words, in order to be intelligible, the concept of theft depends on the concept of legitimately owned property. Similarly, the actual existence of theft presupposes the actual existence of legitimately owned property. Thus, we can be certain it's not the case that all property is theft. In fact, we know we can see that this makes no sense.

Or, as Nathaniel Brandon put it, "theft is a concept that logically and genetically depends on the antecedent concepts of rightfully owned property and refers to the act of taking that property without the owner's consent." If no property is rightfully owned, that is, if nothing is property, there can be no such concepts as theft. Thus, the statement "all property is theft" has an internal contradiction.

So, to use the concept of theft while denying the validity of the concept of property is to use theft as a concept to which one has no logical right; that is, as a stolen concept.

The same problem applies to the phrase "property is aggression" or "initiated force," which I've also seen posted on YouTube lately. I'll briefly explain why you have your work cut out for you if you want to make this claim to a libertarian who is in favor of property rights.

Aggression, in common language, often refers to behavioral manifestations of anger. However, aggression in the context of libertarian or property rights tradition means something more specific and something a little bit different. It refers to the unauthorized use of another person's property or the threat to do the same. It doesn't assume that the aggressor is angry; they might even be very calm while they're doing the aggressing.

So, like with theft, the existence of aggression, understood this way, depends on the existence of legitimate property ownership. Why is this? It's because aggression is the breach of or the violation of property rights, or the threat to violate them.

In fact, we can only detect that aggression has occurred because we have an idea of what a person's property rights are, and that means we notice when they've been violated. So, if you want to say that property is aggression, you should be prepared to explain how you're defining these terms. Because, according to their meanings within the libertarian tradition, it makes no sense.

More Articles

View All
Iceland's Volcanic World | National Geographic
[Applause] I so insisted spectacular place. Not only does Iceland have a boiling river, they’ve even got this volcano you can literally descend into. My name is Anthony Russo and I’m a geothermal scientist and explorer with National Geographic. So when C…
Traveling to the Rainforest with Gisele | Years of Living Dangerously
We’re in Alta Floresta, State of Mato Grosso in Brazil, on a boat going up the river with Giselle. Giselle has been in the Amazon before, but it’s new to her to be a correspondent, to be a reporter, and not just to be the subject of the story but to be an…
Voltage divider | Circuit analysis | Electrical engineering | Khan Academy
Now I’m going to show you a circuit that’s called a voltage divider. This is a name we give to a simple circuit of two series resistors. So I’m just going to draw two series resistors here, and it’s a nickname in the sense of it’s just a pattern that we s…
Utility maximization example
Here we have an actual free response question from a previous AP Economics exam, and it tells us utility and price elasticity of demand are important concepts in explaining consumer behavior. I buy that! Now, part A, they say define marginal utility. So b…
What Could Trigger a Shark Attack? | Rogue Shark
Across the Whit Sundays, hundreds of baited cameras are deployed and listening stations fixed as scientists race to understand why these previously safe waters have turned deadly. As the footage comes in, one big clue emerges: the poor visibility. What w…
Modeling with composite functions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] “Carter has noticed a few quantitative relationships related to the success of his football team and has modeled them with the following functions.” All right, this is interesting. So he has this function, which he denotes with the capital N…