yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

'Property is theft' stolen concept fallacy


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Property is theft. This is a phrase that unpacks as all property is theft, and it's something that I've seen mentioned a few times on YouTube lately. A comment from one of my subscribers, I think in my previous video, prompted me to address this specifically.

To claim all property is theft is one that we can easily show to be incoherent. A stolen object is not considered the property of the thief; even though it's in his possession, it remains the property of the rightful owner. Theft is when property is taken by someone who has no legitimate title to that property, and this person doesn't have the permission of the rightful owner to take it.

So, the existence of legitimately owned property is conceptually ancestral to the concept of theft. In other words, in order to be intelligible, the concept of theft depends on the concept of legitimately owned property. Similarly, the actual existence of theft presupposes the actual existence of legitimately owned property. Thus, we can be certain it's not the case that all property is theft. In fact, we know we can see that this makes no sense.

Or, as Nathaniel Brandon put it, "theft is a concept that logically and genetically depends on the antecedent concepts of rightfully owned property and refers to the act of taking that property without the owner's consent." If no property is rightfully owned, that is, if nothing is property, there can be no such concepts as theft. Thus, the statement "all property is theft" has an internal contradiction.

So, to use the concept of theft while denying the validity of the concept of property is to use theft as a concept to which one has no logical right; that is, as a stolen concept.

The same problem applies to the phrase "property is aggression" or "initiated force," which I've also seen posted on YouTube lately. I'll briefly explain why you have your work cut out for you if you want to make this claim to a libertarian who is in favor of property rights.

Aggression, in common language, often refers to behavioral manifestations of anger. However, aggression in the context of libertarian or property rights tradition means something more specific and something a little bit different. It refers to the unauthorized use of another person's property or the threat to do the same. It doesn't assume that the aggressor is angry; they might even be very calm while they're doing the aggressing.

So, like with theft, the existence of aggression, understood this way, depends on the existence of legitimate property ownership. Why is this? It's because aggression is the breach of or the violation of property rights, or the threat to violate them.

In fact, we can only detect that aggression has occurred because we have an idea of what a person's property rights are, and that means we notice when they've been violated. So, if you want to say that property is aggression, you should be prepared to explain how you're defining these terms. Because, according to their meanings within the libertarian tradition, it makes no sense.

More Articles

View All
Life at Sea | Making the Disney Wish | Mini Episode 6
My name is Sheikha. I’m the senior entertainment manager on board the beautiful Disney Wet. I just love being around the different kinds of people that we have on board and the uniqueness of living at sea. My favorite part of what I do here is the people…
Human fertilization and early development | High school biology | Khan Academy
[Instructor] What we’re gonna do with this video is talk about fertilization and development in human beings, or at least early development in human beings. And this right over here is an actual image of fertilization about to happen or happening. So th…
Worked example: divergent geometric series | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
So we’ve got this infinite series here, and let’s see. It looks like a geometric series. When you go from this first term to the second term, we are multiplying by -3, and then to go to the next term, we’re going to multiply by -3 again. So it looks like…
16 CLEVER Flash Games!
Hello, Vsauce! Michael here, and today I have 16 more creative games just for you. So why wait? Let’s hit the ground running! Or rather, DJing. Record Tripping takes the feeling and live soundtrack mixing of scratching a record with your scroll wheel and…
NEVER DISCUSS These 10 Subjects in order to Live a Stoic Life | Stoicism
STOICISM INSIGHTS Presents NEVER DISCUSS These 10 Subjects in order to Live a Stoic Life. Some things in this world are best left unsaid. Throughout history, powerful kingdoms and rulers have fallen from grace simply because of the exchange of one word.…
Mr. Freeman, part 61 UNCENSORED
There was a man who was constantly suffering. He was too hot, then too cold. He had too much, then too little. He wanted to scream from joy, then wanted to hide in the corner from angst. The stress was making his heart grow callous, his body deteriorate, …