yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

'Property is theft' stolen concept fallacy


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Property is theft. This is a phrase that unpacks as all property is theft, and it's something that I've seen mentioned a few times on YouTube lately. A comment from one of my subscribers, I think in my previous video, prompted me to address this specifically.

To claim all property is theft is one that we can easily show to be incoherent. A stolen object is not considered the property of the thief; even though it's in his possession, it remains the property of the rightful owner. Theft is when property is taken by someone who has no legitimate title to that property, and this person doesn't have the permission of the rightful owner to take it.

So, the existence of legitimately owned property is conceptually ancestral to the concept of theft. In other words, in order to be intelligible, the concept of theft depends on the concept of legitimately owned property. Similarly, the actual existence of theft presupposes the actual existence of legitimately owned property. Thus, we can be certain it's not the case that all property is theft. In fact, we know we can see that this makes no sense.

Or, as Nathaniel Brandon put it, "theft is a concept that logically and genetically depends on the antecedent concepts of rightfully owned property and refers to the act of taking that property without the owner's consent." If no property is rightfully owned, that is, if nothing is property, there can be no such concepts as theft. Thus, the statement "all property is theft" has an internal contradiction.

So, to use the concept of theft while denying the validity of the concept of property is to use theft as a concept to which one has no logical right; that is, as a stolen concept.

The same problem applies to the phrase "property is aggression" or "initiated force," which I've also seen posted on YouTube lately. I'll briefly explain why you have your work cut out for you if you want to make this claim to a libertarian who is in favor of property rights.

Aggression, in common language, often refers to behavioral manifestations of anger. However, aggression in the context of libertarian or property rights tradition means something more specific and something a little bit different. It refers to the unauthorized use of another person's property or the threat to do the same. It doesn't assume that the aggressor is angry; they might even be very calm while they're doing the aggressing.

So, like with theft, the existence of aggression, understood this way, depends on the existence of legitimate property ownership. Why is this? It's because aggression is the breach of or the violation of property rights, or the threat to violate them.

In fact, we can only detect that aggression has occurred because we have an idea of what a person's property rights are, and that means we notice when they've been violated. So, if you want to say that property is aggression, you should be prepared to explain how you're defining these terms. Because, according to their meanings within the libertarian tradition, it makes no sense.

More Articles

View All
Where in the World is Jessica Nabongo? | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
[Music] No one knows exactly when humans started traveling, venturing beyond the little corner of the world they knew to discover new places. In some ways, it feels like it’s always been part of who we are as a species. Before babies can even walk or talk…
Aoife O'Sullivan: Expert Aviation Lawyer Reveals All
Hi, I’m Steve Varzano with the Jet Business in London, and we’re here today to start with episode one of an interview about the aviation industry. Today, I have with me IFA O’Sullivan from the Air Law Firm. She is one of the most notorious expert aviation…
Safari Live - Day 166 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Good afternoon, good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, and a very warm welcome to you again here on Safari Live. We are on a …
Force, mass and acceleration | Movement and forces | Middle school physics | Khan Academy
So, I have three different asteroids over here, and they have different masses. We’ll talk a lot more about what mass means, but one way to think about it is how much stuff there is there. There are other ways to think about it. Let’s say that this first…
Golden age of Islam | World History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In other videos we talk about the rapid spread of Islam, and one of the interesting things about these early Islamic empires is they preserved much of what they inherited from the Byzantine and the Persian empires. The infrastructure, includi…
Married for 88 Years, This Couple Shares Their Secrets to Love | Short Film Showcase
[Music] Episode of Hustle and Athena Rocket. Allah Captain Miranov Qatari long, that’s an understanding in the future. [Music] There is any, yeah, I want a coffee date. Efficient without my dad is under Nate with the grace of God, and Mohammed said in on…