yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

'Property is theft' stolen concept fallacy


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Property is theft. This is a phrase that unpacks as all property is theft, and it's something that I've seen mentioned a few times on YouTube lately. A comment from one of my subscribers, I think in my previous video, prompted me to address this specifically.

To claim all property is theft is one that we can easily show to be incoherent. A stolen object is not considered the property of the thief; even though it's in his possession, it remains the property of the rightful owner. Theft is when property is taken by someone who has no legitimate title to that property, and this person doesn't have the permission of the rightful owner to take it.

So, the existence of legitimately owned property is conceptually ancestral to the concept of theft. In other words, in order to be intelligible, the concept of theft depends on the concept of legitimately owned property. Similarly, the actual existence of theft presupposes the actual existence of legitimately owned property. Thus, we can be certain it's not the case that all property is theft. In fact, we know we can see that this makes no sense.

Or, as Nathaniel Brandon put it, "theft is a concept that logically and genetically depends on the antecedent concepts of rightfully owned property and refers to the act of taking that property without the owner's consent." If no property is rightfully owned, that is, if nothing is property, there can be no such concepts as theft. Thus, the statement "all property is theft" has an internal contradiction.

So, to use the concept of theft while denying the validity of the concept of property is to use theft as a concept to which one has no logical right; that is, as a stolen concept.

The same problem applies to the phrase "property is aggression" or "initiated force," which I've also seen posted on YouTube lately. I'll briefly explain why you have your work cut out for you if you want to make this claim to a libertarian who is in favor of property rights.

Aggression, in common language, often refers to behavioral manifestations of anger. However, aggression in the context of libertarian or property rights tradition means something more specific and something a little bit different. It refers to the unauthorized use of another person's property or the threat to do the same. It doesn't assume that the aggressor is angry; they might even be very calm while they're doing the aggressing.

So, like with theft, the existence of aggression, understood this way, depends on the existence of legitimate property ownership. Why is this? It's because aggression is the breach of or the violation of property rights, or the threat to violate them.

In fact, we can only detect that aggression has occurred because we have an idea of what a person's property rights are, and that means we notice when they've been violated. So, if you want to say that property is aggression, you should be prepared to explain how you're defining these terms. Because, according to their meanings within the libertarian tradition, it makes no sense.

More Articles

View All
Charlie Munger: We're Playing With Fire (Interview)
[Music] Hey guys, welcome back to the channel. We got something really cool to talk about today: Charlie Munger. As you guys know, one of my favorite investors, he recently did a 45-50 minute interview with the California Institute of Technology, which i…
15 Daily Habits to Boost Your Intelligence
Everybody wants to be more intelligent, right? There’s no denying that. So where do people get stuck? Some may try to debate this, but here are the facts: Although genetics do play a part in cognitive development, or intelligence as most of us call it, fo…
Bill Belichick & Ray Dalio on Picking People: Part 2
In our conversations, one of the things that I liked about what you did, and um, which is what I do, is you get very clear on the specs. You know that people are different, and you make very clear distinctions of what somebody is like, you know. We try to…
How I find private jet clients.
This is the interior of our Airbus 319. Wow, it’s an airplane! I built the airplane, which is the same airplane that EasyJet buys around. Of course, we’re seating 12 people in there, seating 212 people. You do meet things in there. So, what we do sometim…
Taoism: The Philosophy of Flow
Your alarm rings, waking you up from an unrestful sleep. You stretch across the bed and tap your phone to silence the disturbing noise. You’re tempted to pick it up and see what’s going on in the world, but you try really hard to stay away from it. Remind…
15 Biggest Obstacles You'll Have in Your Life
Hey there, Alaer! Welcome back. Today’s chat is a little bit longer than usual because we really wanted to do all of these obstacles justice. You might not face every one of them in your life; we certainly hope not, but chances are you faced some of these…