yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Making of O.J. Simpson: Made in America | Ezra Edelman | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Sometimes there are stories that you are told that you think are interesting, revelatory, maybe even helpful to the narrative. There’s nothing that you have to further illustrate what someone’s talking about. And if you’re doing a movie and it’s full of visuals, and you’re trying to construct this consistent visual palette—even if it’s on three different sort of wavelengths as far as photos, footage, stuff that you shot, what have you. If you can’t find something that is consistent in a way that you can tell that story, then you have nothing.

Sometimes you just can’t use it. And that’s really frustrating and sad, especially when again we’re talking about truth and documenting events, and you’re like, well no, that’s just inconvenient. Frankly, if something is so important, you figure out a way, and sometimes it’s like we can’t all shoot interviews with six different cameras. And so you don’t necessarily have the luxury. I’ll just cut all different ways to make sure it’s fine. And so you get creative.

There’s a scene in the movie that is probably five and a half hours into the movie in part four of the documentary where you’ve gone through most of the trial. It’s become the media circus that it is. And all of a sudden we get to this— the deputy DA, Bill Hodgeman, clinically taking you through his version and his belief of what happened the night of the murders on June 12, 1994.

So he had given me a presentation in his office, in the DA’s office in Los Angeles, a couple of weeks before I sat down with the new head and did an interview. And he went through this slideshow presentation that he gives to people in law enforcement when he talks about that case. And included is, you know, he gives pictures— included these pictures of the murder scene.

Now when we did the interview I said, “Hey Bill, do you mind just sort of running through that? Giving me your version of events.” So for six and a half minutes, he sat there and clinically went beat by beat of what happened that night. And even listening to him, it was chilling. And there was an argument by some who I was working with that said just do that. Just have him talk.

Again, this notion of what is truth. It’s his version of what he believes. There’s no videotape. No one knows exactly what happened. But he’s telling us. And so there’s first of all an instinct to say, “Oh, I don’t want to edit this at all.” It’s so graphic. It’s so personal to sort of what he—the 20 years he spent thinking about this. It’s so specific I want to include everything.

And then you go, well, you know what? I can’t just have six minutes of a guy on screen. This is the sort of practical as a filmmaker, well, I can’t just have six minutes of them on screen saying this. And also, what’s the best version of this? Is that bad? Him surely recollecting about what he thinks happened. Or can we add visuals? Can we turn this into a more emotionally wrenching anecdote than him just sitting in a chair?

And then when you know that actually there are these murder photos—these photos of the crime scene that exist. And they aren’t photos by the way that I might feel compelled to otherwise use except for the fact that here’s a guy in his position clinically dispassionately going through what he believes happened. That is almost the only way I would have ever thought of using such graphic photos because there is a real purpose to it.

There’s a real purpose to understanding the brutality of the crime. And there’s a real purpose for you to sit there and realize, like, you need to deal with what is happening here. What happened. You need to deal with the way that this guy is talking about it so soberly versus the spectacle that this trial has become. You need to, as if you were, stop and whatever you think of O.J. Simpson, why don’t you look at this and why don’t you see if you can look at him the same way after that.

Now the point being is that that scene ends up being this horrific thing. Now there’s no music. There is sound design. But there are so many choices that go into how am I going to portray this, especially portray something that is so sensitive and that could be absorbed in so many different ways by so many people. And so those are the things that are sort of you have to really make sure that you are making the correct choices.

More Articles

View All
The Moons of Mars Explained -- Phobos & Deimos MM#2
The moons of Mars explained. Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos. They are really tiny. How tiny? Compared to Mars or our own moon, pretty tiny. Although, tiny is a matter of opinion. Their surface area is up close to some of the smallest states on Eart…
Welcome to high school biology | High school biology | Khan Academy
It’s very easy to take for granted some of the very amazing things that surround us. In particular, the notion of life on a day-to-day basis — we’re used to it. We are living things; we see living things all around us, and we get preoccupied with other th…
Peter Lynch: The 5 Secrets to Outperforming the Market
So if you’ve been following this channel for any period of time, you know I’m a big fan of Warren Buffett. Just look at all of the videos I’ve made on him and his investing principles. However, what might come as a big surprise to you is that it actually …
Regrouping to add 1-digit number | Addition and subtraction | 1st grade | Khan Academy
So, we have the number 35. The 3 is in the tens place, so it represents 30 or 3 tens—one 10, two groups of 10, three groups of 10. And then the 5 is in the ones place, so it represents five ones. We see them right over here—one, two, three, four, five. N…
Multiplying 3-digit by 2-digit numbers: Error analysis | Grade 5 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
So we have a situation here where someone is attempting to multiply 586 * 43, and what we want to do together is figure out if they did this correctly or whether they made a mistake. And if they made a mistake, what step did they make a mistake on? Actual…
2015 AP Chemistry free response 2a (part 2/2) and b | Chemistry | Khan Academy
All right, now let’s tackle, in the last video we did the first part of Part A. Now let’s do the second part of Part A. So the second part of Part A, they say calculate the number of moles of ethine that would be produced if the dehydration reaction went…