yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Making of O.J. Simpson: Made in America | Ezra Edelman | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Sometimes there are stories that you are told that you think are interesting, revelatory, maybe even helpful to the narrative. There’s nothing that you have to further illustrate what someone’s talking about. And if you’re doing a movie and it’s full of visuals, and you’re trying to construct this consistent visual palette—even if it’s on three different sort of wavelengths as far as photos, footage, stuff that you shot, what have you. If you can’t find something that is consistent in a way that you can tell that story, then you have nothing.

Sometimes you just can’t use it. And that’s really frustrating and sad, especially when again we’re talking about truth and documenting events, and you’re like, well no, that’s just inconvenient. Frankly, if something is so important, you figure out a way, and sometimes it’s like we can’t all shoot interviews with six different cameras. And so you don’t necessarily have the luxury. I’ll just cut all different ways to make sure it’s fine. And so you get creative.

There’s a scene in the movie that is probably five and a half hours into the movie in part four of the documentary where you’ve gone through most of the trial. It’s become the media circus that it is. And all of a sudden we get to this— the deputy DA, Bill Hodgeman, clinically taking you through his version and his belief of what happened the night of the murders on June 12, 1994.

So he had given me a presentation in his office, in the DA’s office in Los Angeles, a couple of weeks before I sat down with the new head and did an interview. And he went through this slideshow presentation that he gives to people in law enforcement when he talks about that case. And included is, you know, he gives pictures— included these pictures of the murder scene.

Now when we did the interview I said, “Hey Bill, do you mind just sort of running through that? Giving me your version of events.” So for six and a half minutes, he sat there and clinically went beat by beat of what happened that night. And even listening to him, it was chilling. And there was an argument by some who I was working with that said just do that. Just have him talk.

Again, this notion of what is truth. It’s his version of what he believes. There’s no videotape. No one knows exactly what happened. But he’s telling us. And so there’s first of all an instinct to say, “Oh, I don’t want to edit this at all.” It’s so graphic. It’s so personal to sort of what he—the 20 years he spent thinking about this. It’s so specific I want to include everything.

And then you go, well, you know what? I can’t just have six minutes of a guy on screen. This is the sort of practical as a filmmaker, well, I can’t just have six minutes of them on screen saying this. And also, what’s the best version of this? Is that bad? Him surely recollecting about what he thinks happened. Or can we add visuals? Can we turn this into a more emotionally wrenching anecdote than him just sitting in a chair?

And then when you know that actually there are these murder photos—these photos of the crime scene that exist. And they aren’t photos by the way that I might feel compelled to otherwise use except for the fact that here’s a guy in his position clinically dispassionately going through what he believes happened. That is almost the only way I would have ever thought of using such graphic photos because there is a real purpose to it.

There’s a real purpose to understanding the brutality of the crime. And there’s a real purpose for you to sit there and realize, like, you need to deal with what is happening here. What happened. You need to deal with the way that this guy is talking about it so soberly versus the spectacle that this trial has become. You need to, as if you were, stop and whatever you think of O.J. Simpson, why don’t you look at this and why don’t you see if you can look at him the same way after that.

Now the point being is that that scene ends up being this horrific thing. Now there’s no music. There is sound design. But there are so many choices that go into how am I going to portray this, especially portray something that is so sensitive and that could be absorbed in so many different ways by so many people. And so those are the things that are sort of you have to really make sure that you are making the correct choices.

More Articles

View All
Care About the Ocean? Think Twice About Your Coffee Lid. | Short Film Showcase
Humankind is not woven the web of life; we are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together; all things connect. The diversity of life on Earth is entirely dependent on one crucial element: water. …
Rant: The TRUTH about happiness
I’m just going to rant a little bit about happiness because it seems like a lot of people are very hung up about buying a certain thing, achieving a certain level of success, achieving a certain level of wealth. So many materialistic things that they thi…
YouTube Shorts is Changing YouTube - Smarter Every Day 266
Hey, it’s me, Dustin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! I am in the thinkI place, and today on this video, I would like to take you to the thinkI place with me. The other day, my friend’s dad said something that was like a throwaway dad comment at first.…
PEOPLE WHO LIKE TO BE ALONE HAVE THESE 10 SPECIAL PERSONALITY TRAITS | STOICISM INSIGHTS
In a world that never stops talking, where silence is often filled with the next notification, there’s a truth we seldom acknowledge. The loudest moments in our lives are not the ones filled with noise but those heavy with our own thoughts and reflections…
Butterfly Takeoff at 2,000 Frames per Second - Smarter Every Day 79
[Music] Hey, it’s me, DTin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! The cat is disturbing homework time, so we’re going to take a break and make an intro. Every time I’ve observed a butterfly flying across a field, he looks like he’s a very poor flyer. He loo…
Why It Actually Might Be 'Survival of the Friendliest' | Nat Geo Explores
[Music] It’s a dog-eat-dog world: winner takes all, survival of the fittest. But is it really? If the biggest and baddest always win, how come there are so many more of them than them? Strength is helpful, but friendliness might actually be the key to evo…