yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Making of O.J. Simpson: Made in America | Ezra Edelman | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Sometimes there are stories that you are told that you think are interesting, revelatory, maybe even helpful to the narrative. There’s nothing that you have to further illustrate what someone’s talking about. And if you’re doing a movie and it’s full of visuals, and you’re trying to construct this consistent visual palette—even if it’s on three different sort of wavelengths as far as photos, footage, stuff that you shot, what have you. If you can’t find something that is consistent in a way that you can tell that story, then you have nothing.

Sometimes you just can’t use it. And that’s really frustrating and sad, especially when again we’re talking about truth and documenting events, and you’re like, well no, that’s just inconvenient. Frankly, if something is so important, you figure out a way, and sometimes it’s like we can’t all shoot interviews with six different cameras. And so you don’t necessarily have the luxury. I’ll just cut all different ways to make sure it’s fine. And so you get creative.

There’s a scene in the movie that is probably five and a half hours into the movie in part four of the documentary where you’ve gone through most of the trial. It’s become the media circus that it is. And all of a sudden we get to this— the deputy DA, Bill Hodgeman, clinically taking you through his version and his belief of what happened the night of the murders on June 12, 1994.

So he had given me a presentation in his office, in the DA’s office in Los Angeles, a couple of weeks before I sat down with the new head and did an interview. And he went through this slideshow presentation that he gives to people in law enforcement when he talks about that case. And included is, you know, he gives pictures— included these pictures of the murder scene.

Now when we did the interview I said, “Hey Bill, do you mind just sort of running through that? Giving me your version of events.” So for six and a half minutes, he sat there and clinically went beat by beat of what happened that night. And even listening to him, it was chilling. And there was an argument by some who I was working with that said just do that. Just have him talk.

Again, this notion of what is truth. It’s his version of what he believes. There’s no videotape. No one knows exactly what happened. But he’s telling us. And so there’s first of all an instinct to say, “Oh, I don’t want to edit this at all.” It’s so graphic. It’s so personal to sort of what he—the 20 years he spent thinking about this. It’s so specific I want to include everything.

And then you go, well, you know what? I can’t just have six minutes of a guy on screen. This is the sort of practical as a filmmaker, well, I can’t just have six minutes of them on screen saying this. And also, what’s the best version of this? Is that bad? Him surely recollecting about what he thinks happened. Or can we add visuals? Can we turn this into a more emotionally wrenching anecdote than him just sitting in a chair?

And then when you know that actually there are these murder photos—these photos of the crime scene that exist. And they aren’t photos by the way that I might feel compelled to otherwise use except for the fact that here’s a guy in his position clinically dispassionately going through what he believes happened. That is almost the only way I would have ever thought of using such graphic photos because there is a real purpose to it.

There’s a real purpose to understanding the brutality of the crime. And there’s a real purpose for you to sit there and realize, like, you need to deal with what is happening here. What happened. You need to deal with the way that this guy is talking about it so soberly versus the spectacle that this trial has become. You need to, as if you were, stop and whatever you think of O.J. Simpson, why don’t you look at this and why don’t you see if you can look at him the same way after that.

Now the point being is that that scene ends up being this horrific thing. Now there’s no music. There is sound design. But there are so many choices that go into how am I going to portray this, especially portray something that is so sensitive and that could be absorbed in so many different ways by so many people. And so those are the things that are sort of you have to really make sure that you are making the correct choices.

More Articles

View All
Multiplying and dividing by powers of 10
In another video, we introduce ourselves to the idea of powers of 10. We saw that if I were to just say 10 to the first power, that means that we’re just really just going to take 1. If we have 10 to the second power, that means that we’re going to take …
Length of a trip in 24 hour time | Math | Khan Academy
Hello! So we’re told Colette rides her bike home from school every afternoon. She leaves school at 14:55 and arrives home at 15:25. How long does she ride her bike? So pause this video like always and see if you can answer that question: how long is her b…
Comparative advantage - output approach | Basic economic concepts | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
In this, in the next video, we’re going to learn how to calculate opportunity costs and determine who has the comparative advantage in a goods production using data from both an output table and an input table. If we look at our PPCs in the graph on the l…
Worked example: estimating e_ using Lagrange error bound | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Estimating e to the 1.45 using a Taylor polynomial about x equal 2, what is the least degree of the polynomial that assures an error smaller than 0.001? In general, if you see a situation like this where we’re talking about approximating a function with …
Behind the scenes: Flying a drone like albatross | Incredible Animal Journeys | National Geographic
Good morning on board the Explorer and greetings from the mud room. They say that size doesn’t matter. Taking enough in three, two, one—here we [Music] go! But in this case, it kind of does. One of the ways we’re reducing risk when flying drones like thi…
Newton's law of gravitation | Physics | Khan Academy
The mass of the Earth is about 6 * 10 ^ 24 kg. But you know what? I always wondered, how did we figure this out? How on Earth do you figure out the mass of a planet? Well, we did that by using Newton’s universal law of gravity, and in this video, we’re go…