yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Making of O.J. Simpson: Made in America | Ezra Edelman | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Sometimes there are stories that you are told that you think are interesting, revelatory, maybe even helpful to the narrative. There’s nothing that you have to further illustrate what someone’s talking about. And if you’re doing a movie and it’s full of visuals, and you’re trying to construct this consistent visual palette—even if it’s on three different sort of wavelengths as far as photos, footage, stuff that you shot, what have you. If you can’t find something that is consistent in a way that you can tell that story, then you have nothing.

Sometimes you just can’t use it. And that’s really frustrating and sad, especially when again we’re talking about truth and documenting events, and you’re like, well no, that’s just inconvenient. Frankly, if something is so important, you figure out a way, and sometimes it’s like we can’t all shoot interviews with six different cameras. And so you don’t necessarily have the luxury. I’ll just cut all different ways to make sure it’s fine. And so you get creative.

There’s a scene in the movie that is probably five and a half hours into the movie in part four of the documentary where you’ve gone through most of the trial. It’s become the media circus that it is. And all of a sudden we get to this— the deputy DA, Bill Hodgeman, clinically taking you through his version and his belief of what happened the night of the murders on June 12, 1994.

So he had given me a presentation in his office, in the DA’s office in Los Angeles, a couple of weeks before I sat down with the new head and did an interview. And he went through this slideshow presentation that he gives to people in law enforcement when he talks about that case. And included is, you know, he gives pictures— included these pictures of the murder scene.

Now when we did the interview I said, “Hey Bill, do you mind just sort of running through that? Giving me your version of events.” So for six and a half minutes, he sat there and clinically went beat by beat of what happened that night. And even listening to him, it was chilling. And there was an argument by some who I was working with that said just do that. Just have him talk.

Again, this notion of what is truth. It’s his version of what he believes. There’s no videotape. No one knows exactly what happened. But he’s telling us. And so there’s first of all an instinct to say, “Oh, I don’t want to edit this at all.” It’s so graphic. It’s so personal to sort of what he—the 20 years he spent thinking about this. It’s so specific I want to include everything.

And then you go, well, you know what? I can’t just have six minutes of a guy on screen. This is the sort of practical as a filmmaker, well, I can’t just have six minutes of them on screen saying this. And also, what’s the best version of this? Is that bad? Him surely recollecting about what he thinks happened. Or can we add visuals? Can we turn this into a more emotionally wrenching anecdote than him just sitting in a chair?

And then when you know that actually there are these murder photos—these photos of the crime scene that exist. And they aren’t photos by the way that I might feel compelled to otherwise use except for the fact that here’s a guy in his position clinically dispassionately going through what he believes happened. That is almost the only way I would have ever thought of using such graphic photos because there is a real purpose to it.

There’s a real purpose to understanding the brutality of the crime. And there’s a real purpose for you to sit there and realize, like, you need to deal with what is happening here. What happened. You need to deal with the way that this guy is talking about it so soberly versus the spectacle that this trial has become. You need to, as if you were, stop and whatever you think of O.J. Simpson, why don’t you look at this and why don’t you see if you can look at him the same way after that.

Now the point being is that that scene ends up being this horrific thing. Now there’s no music. There is sound design. But there are so many choices that go into how am I going to portray this, especially portray something that is so sensitive and that could be absorbed in so many different ways by so many people. And so those are the things that are sort of you have to really make sure that you are making the correct choices.

More Articles

View All
Impact of changes to trophic pyramids | High school biology | Khan Academy
What we see here is known as a trophic pyramid, and the word “trophic” in a biology context is referring to food relationships. So, one way to think about this is that it tells us who is eating whom and who is producing energy, and then who is able to lev…
Quantum Computers Explained – Limits of Human Technology
Quantum Computers Explained – Limits of Human Technology For most of our history, human technology consisted of our brains, fire, and sharp sticks. While fire and sharp sticks became power plants and nuclear weapons, the biggest upgrade has happened to o…
CS50 Lecture by Mark Zuckerberg - 7 December 2005
MICHAEL D. SMITH: This afternoon I have the pleasure of introducing Mark Zuckerberg, which is one of our guest speakers this semester to come and talk a little bit about computer science in the real world. As most of you probably know, as you guys all do …
The Sacrifice of Cassini | Cosmos: Possible Worlds
[Ethereal music] Why do some worlds have rings and others don’t? Why no rings for Earth or Mars? We wouldn’t recognize Saturn without them. He looks naked without his rings. But how did he get them in the first place? This is exactly what the French astr…
Dating apps are more dangerous than you think
A couple of weeks ago, I was having dinner with a friend and overheard what had to be a first date at the table right next to us. The conversation was awkward at first, as they both seemed to struggle to get a good flow going. I looked over a bit later to…
Return on capital and economic growth
One of the core ideas of “Capital in the 21st Century” is comparing the after-tax return on capital, let me write that a little bit neater: return on capital, to economic growth. The contention is that if the return on capital ® is greater than economic g…