yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Introduction to t statistics | Confidence intervals | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We have already seen a situation multiple times where there is some parameter associated with the population. Maybe it's the proportion of a population that supports a candidate; maybe it's the mean of a population, the mean height of all the people in the city.

We've determined that it's unpractical or we just—there's no way for us to know the true population parameter. But we could try to estimate it by taking a sample size. So, we take n samples and then we calculate a statistic based on that.

We've also seen that not only can we calculate the statistic, which is trying to estimate this parameter, but we can construct a confidence interval about that statistic based on some confidence level. That confidence interval would look something like this: it would be the value of the statistic that we have just calculated plus or minus some margin of error.

We’ll often say this critical value, z, and this will be based on the number of standard deviations we want to go above and below that statistic. Then, we'll multiply that times the standard deviation of the sampling distribution for that statistic.

Now, what we'll see is we often don't know this. To know this, you oftentimes even need to know this parameter. For example, in the situation where the parameter that we're trying to estimate and construct confidence intervals for is, say, the population proportion—what percentage of the population supports a certain candidate?

Well, in that world the statistic is the sample proportion. So, we would have the sample proportion plus or minus z star times—well, we can't calculate this unless we know the population proportion. So instead, we estimate this with the standard error of the statistic, which in this case is p hat times 1 minus p hat, the sample proportion times 1 minus the sample proportion over our sample size.

If the parameter we're trying to estimate is the population mean, then our statistic is going to be the sample mean. So in that scenario, we are going to be looking at our statistic; our sample mean plus or minus z star. Now, if we knew the standard deviation of this population, we would know what the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of our statistic is. It would be equal to the standard deviation of our population times the square root of our sample size.

But we often will not know this. In fact, it's very unusual to know this. So sometimes you will say, "Okay, if we don't know this, let's just figure out the sample standard deviation of our sample." Here, instead we'll say, "Okay, let's take our sample mean plus or minus z star times the sample standard deviation of our sample, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n."

Now, this might seem pretty good if we're trying to construct a confidence interval for our sample for our mean, but it turns out that this is not so good. Because it turns out that this right over here is going to actually underestimate the actual interval, the true margin of error you need for your confidence level.

And so that's why statisticians have invented another statistic. Instead of using z, they call it t. Instead of using a z table, they use a t table, and we're going to see this in future videos.

So if you are actually trying to construct a confidence interval for a sample mean, and you don't know the true standard deviation of your population—which is normally the case—instead of doing this, what we're going to do is we're going to take our sample mean plus or minus our critical value. We'll call that t star times our sample standard deviation, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n.

So the real functional difference is that this actually is going to give us the confidence interval that actually has the level of confidence that we want. If we have 195 percent level of confidence, if we keep computing this over and over again for multiple samples, that roughly 95 percent of the time this interval will contain our true population mean.

To functionally do it—and we'll do it in future videos—you really just have to look up a t table instead of a z table.

More Articles

View All
Saving Manatees: What It Takes - Meet the Expert | National Geographic
So good to see you all again! I’m so excited for this time every week. Um, we get the opportunity to chat to a wonderful scientist, or expert, or conservationist live somewhere in the world, and we get to chat about some of their awesome research projects…
Opium Wars | World History | Khan Academy
This is a map of East Asia in the 19th century, and you can already see significant imperial control by Western European powers. You have the British East India Company in India. You have the French initially getting a foothold in Southeast Vietnam in thi…
What is Random?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here and Derek. Generate(!) 78? That’s so random. Or is it? What does it mean to be random? Can anything really be random? What’s the most random thing ever? Today let’s stop being random and become ‘ransmart’. If something is unpred…
I Am Associated With Red Straps Now #shorts
Are there any watches where you think you shouldn’t put a red strap on? I own a 5711 in its mintage form. I wear it; the bracelet for that is part of the heritage of the piece. But it means it can’t take the journey with me onto television because I’m ass…
What Is The Resolution Of The Eye?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. I am at the White House, in America’s capital, Washington, D.C. America makes a lot of feature films every year - Hollywood. But they don’t make the most feature films every year. Nigeria makes more. But the country that makes t…
Dred Scott v. Sandford | The Civil War era (1844-1877) | US history | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today we’re learning more about the landmark Supreme Court case Dred Scott versus Sanford, decided in 1857. The ruling in the Dred Scott case inflamed sectional tensions over slavery, which had been growing ever more hea…