yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Introduction to t statistics | Confidence intervals | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We have already seen a situation multiple times where there is some parameter associated with the population. Maybe it's the proportion of a population that supports a candidate; maybe it's the mean of a population, the mean height of all the people in the city.

We've determined that it's unpractical or we just—there's no way for us to know the true population parameter. But we could try to estimate it by taking a sample size. So, we take n samples and then we calculate a statistic based on that.

We've also seen that not only can we calculate the statistic, which is trying to estimate this parameter, but we can construct a confidence interval about that statistic based on some confidence level. That confidence interval would look something like this: it would be the value of the statistic that we have just calculated plus or minus some margin of error.

We’ll often say this critical value, z, and this will be based on the number of standard deviations we want to go above and below that statistic. Then, we'll multiply that times the standard deviation of the sampling distribution for that statistic.

Now, what we'll see is we often don't know this. To know this, you oftentimes even need to know this parameter. For example, in the situation where the parameter that we're trying to estimate and construct confidence intervals for is, say, the population proportion—what percentage of the population supports a certain candidate?

Well, in that world the statistic is the sample proportion. So, we would have the sample proportion plus or minus z star times—well, we can't calculate this unless we know the population proportion. So instead, we estimate this with the standard error of the statistic, which in this case is p hat times 1 minus p hat, the sample proportion times 1 minus the sample proportion over our sample size.

If the parameter we're trying to estimate is the population mean, then our statistic is going to be the sample mean. So in that scenario, we are going to be looking at our statistic; our sample mean plus or minus z star. Now, if we knew the standard deviation of this population, we would know what the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of our statistic is. It would be equal to the standard deviation of our population times the square root of our sample size.

But we often will not know this. In fact, it's very unusual to know this. So sometimes you will say, "Okay, if we don't know this, let's just figure out the sample standard deviation of our sample." Here, instead we'll say, "Okay, let's take our sample mean plus or minus z star times the sample standard deviation of our sample, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n."

Now, this might seem pretty good if we're trying to construct a confidence interval for our sample for our mean, but it turns out that this is not so good. Because it turns out that this right over here is going to actually underestimate the actual interval, the true margin of error you need for your confidence level.

And so that's why statisticians have invented another statistic. Instead of using z, they call it t. Instead of using a z table, they use a t table, and we're going to see this in future videos.

So if you are actually trying to construct a confidence interval for a sample mean, and you don't know the true standard deviation of your population—which is normally the case—instead of doing this, what we're going to do is we're going to take our sample mean plus or minus our critical value. We'll call that t star times our sample standard deviation, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n.

So the real functional difference is that this actually is going to give us the confidence interval that actually has the level of confidence that we want. If we have 195 percent level of confidence, if we keep computing this over and over again for multiple samples, that roughly 95 percent of the time this interval will contain our true population mean.

To functionally do it—and we'll do it in future videos—you really just have to look up a t table instead of a z table.

More Articles

View All
Chase Adam at Startup School NY 2014
Chase Adams, the founder of Watsi. Watsi is the crowdfunding platform for healthcare that lets anyone donate as little as $5 to fund medical care for people in need. So before starting Watsi, Chase traveled, worked, and studied in more than 20 countries. …
TikTok Is Causing A Mass Psychosis
[Music] In June 2019, Kirsten Muellerval, a psychiatrist at Hanover Medical School and head of its Tourette’s outpatient department, noticed unusual symptoms in her new set of patients. To begin with, all of them were teenagers, and they were suffering fr…
It Started: Japan Just Broke The US Stock Market
Is America heading towards the recession? The Dow’s down more than 1,000 points as that global selloff intensifies overnight. Japan’s Nikkei plunged 12%; that is its worst day since 1987. Seems like a recession cannot be ruled out just yet. What’s up, yo…
Skipping Stones and Mailing Postcards- Smarter Every Day 88
Hey, it’s me Destin! Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. So, if you think about it, for thousands of years, people have verbally skipped along or passed down through generations the art of skipping stones. Today, it’s my turn to do the same. When you thro…
Lagrange multipliers, using tangency to solve constrained optimization
In the last video, I introduced a constrained optimization problem where we were trying to maximize this function f of x y equals x squared times y, but subject to a constraint that your values of x and y have to satisfy x squared plus y squared equals on…
Why The $1 Electric Scooter Will TAKE OVER The World
And for all the young entrepreneurs out there, just realize that sometimes it’s the most simple ideas that often do the best. I think we have the natural tendency just to overcomplicate things because we believe the more complicated something is, the bett…