yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Introduction to t statistics | Confidence intervals | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We have already seen a situation multiple times where there is some parameter associated with the population. Maybe it's the proportion of a population that supports a candidate; maybe it's the mean of a population, the mean height of all the people in the city.

We've determined that it's unpractical or we just—there's no way for us to know the true population parameter. But we could try to estimate it by taking a sample size. So, we take n samples and then we calculate a statistic based on that.

We've also seen that not only can we calculate the statistic, which is trying to estimate this parameter, but we can construct a confidence interval about that statistic based on some confidence level. That confidence interval would look something like this: it would be the value of the statistic that we have just calculated plus or minus some margin of error.

We’ll often say this critical value, z, and this will be based on the number of standard deviations we want to go above and below that statistic. Then, we'll multiply that times the standard deviation of the sampling distribution for that statistic.

Now, what we'll see is we often don't know this. To know this, you oftentimes even need to know this parameter. For example, in the situation where the parameter that we're trying to estimate and construct confidence intervals for is, say, the population proportion—what percentage of the population supports a certain candidate?

Well, in that world the statistic is the sample proportion. So, we would have the sample proportion plus or minus z star times—well, we can't calculate this unless we know the population proportion. So instead, we estimate this with the standard error of the statistic, which in this case is p hat times 1 minus p hat, the sample proportion times 1 minus the sample proportion over our sample size.

If the parameter we're trying to estimate is the population mean, then our statistic is going to be the sample mean. So in that scenario, we are going to be looking at our statistic; our sample mean plus or minus z star. Now, if we knew the standard deviation of this population, we would know what the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of our statistic is. It would be equal to the standard deviation of our population times the square root of our sample size.

But we often will not know this. In fact, it's very unusual to know this. So sometimes you will say, "Okay, if we don't know this, let's just figure out the sample standard deviation of our sample." Here, instead we'll say, "Okay, let's take our sample mean plus or minus z star times the sample standard deviation of our sample, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n."

Now, this might seem pretty good if we're trying to construct a confidence interval for our sample for our mean, but it turns out that this is not so good. Because it turns out that this right over here is going to actually underestimate the actual interval, the true margin of error you need for your confidence level.

And so that's why statisticians have invented another statistic. Instead of using z, they call it t. Instead of using a z table, they use a t table, and we're going to see this in future videos.

So if you are actually trying to construct a confidence interval for a sample mean, and you don't know the true standard deviation of your population—which is normally the case—instead of doing this, what we're going to do is we're going to take our sample mean plus or minus our critical value. We'll call that t star times our sample standard deviation, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n.

So the real functional difference is that this actually is going to give us the confidence interval that actually has the level of confidence that we want. If we have 195 percent level of confidence, if we keep computing this over and over again for multiple samples, that roughly 95 percent of the time this interval will contain our true population mean.

To functionally do it—and we'll do it in future videos—you really just have to look up a t table instead of a z table.

More Articles

View All
Why Coca Cola Still Spends Billions On Ads
For over a century, Coca-Cola has been selling the most successful product in the history of humankind. Since its humble beginnings in 1886, when John Pemberton first brewed a mixture of cocoa leaves and cola nuts, Coca-Cola has undergone a remarkable tra…
Wave properties | Wave properties | High School Physics | Khan Academy
Imagine that I’m standing here holding the end of a rope. I’m over here on the left end, and while holding the rope, I rapidly move my hand up, down, and back to the starting position. If we were to take a snapshot of the rope immediately after I finish m…
Preparing for Mules | Live Free or Die
In the wilderness, economy doesn’t exist. The only economy we have is an economy of motion. I have no electricity, no running water. If the world came to an end, I could totally take care of myself. My blacksmithing puts food on the table; it’s my main me…
The Better Boarding Method Airlines Won't Use
[Inaudible airport announcements] [Grey sighs] What’s the fastest way to board an airplane? I mean, you can’t just throw open the gates like funneling cattle into a chute. That’s not for us. We’re primates, after all! So let’s put our monkey brains to wor…
NASA Spacecraft Is About to Enter Jupiter’s Orbit | National Geographic
The scariest thing to me about Juno are the unknowns. So much about the environment that we’ll have to withstand is unknown. Nothing’s really certain about what’s going to happen. It’s a monster. It’s unforgiving. It’s relentless. It’s spinning around so…
Robot vs. Volcano: “Sometimes It’s Just Fun to Blow Stuff Up” (Exclusive) | National Geographic
It was a dedicated mission to take technology to the absolute limits and then destroy it. Oh yeah, those guys got to be careful. I don’t think we can get much closer to a big seismic event underwater than this. We were at Kavachi a couple years ago and we…