yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Introduction to t statistics | Confidence intervals | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We have already seen a situation multiple times where there is some parameter associated with the population. Maybe it's the proportion of a population that supports a candidate; maybe it's the mean of a population, the mean height of all the people in the city.

We've determined that it's unpractical or we just—there's no way for us to know the true population parameter. But we could try to estimate it by taking a sample size. So, we take n samples and then we calculate a statistic based on that.

We've also seen that not only can we calculate the statistic, which is trying to estimate this parameter, but we can construct a confidence interval about that statistic based on some confidence level. That confidence interval would look something like this: it would be the value of the statistic that we have just calculated plus or minus some margin of error.

We’ll often say this critical value, z, and this will be based on the number of standard deviations we want to go above and below that statistic. Then, we'll multiply that times the standard deviation of the sampling distribution for that statistic.

Now, what we'll see is we often don't know this. To know this, you oftentimes even need to know this parameter. For example, in the situation where the parameter that we're trying to estimate and construct confidence intervals for is, say, the population proportion—what percentage of the population supports a certain candidate?

Well, in that world the statistic is the sample proportion. So, we would have the sample proportion plus or minus z star times—well, we can't calculate this unless we know the population proportion. So instead, we estimate this with the standard error of the statistic, which in this case is p hat times 1 minus p hat, the sample proportion times 1 minus the sample proportion over our sample size.

If the parameter we're trying to estimate is the population mean, then our statistic is going to be the sample mean. So in that scenario, we are going to be looking at our statistic; our sample mean plus or minus z star. Now, if we knew the standard deviation of this population, we would know what the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of our statistic is. It would be equal to the standard deviation of our population times the square root of our sample size.

But we often will not know this. In fact, it's very unusual to know this. So sometimes you will say, "Okay, if we don't know this, let's just figure out the sample standard deviation of our sample." Here, instead we'll say, "Okay, let's take our sample mean plus or minus z star times the sample standard deviation of our sample, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n."

Now, this might seem pretty good if we're trying to construct a confidence interval for our sample for our mean, but it turns out that this is not so good. Because it turns out that this right over here is going to actually underestimate the actual interval, the true margin of error you need for your confidence level.

And so that's why statisticians have invented another statistic. Instead of using z, they call it t. Instead of using a z table, they use a t table, and we're going to see this in future videos.

So if you are actually trying to construct a confidence interval for a sample mean, and you don't know the true standard deviation of your population—which is normally the case—instead of doing this, what we're going to do is we're going to take our sample mean plus or minus our critical value. We'll call that t star times our sample standard deviation, which we can calculate divided by the square root of n.

So the real functional difference is that this actually is going to give us the confidence interval that actually has the level of confidence that we want. If we have 195 percent level of confidence, if we keep computing this over and over again for multiple samples, that roughly 95 percent of the time this interval will contain our true population mean.

To functionally do it—and we'll do it in future videos—you really just have to look up a t table instead of a z table.

More Articles

View All
Titanic 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] The turn of the 20th century saw a golden age of industry and prosperity in many Western countries. One aspect of this era came to epitomize its grandeur and ultimately its downfall: the Titanic. Commissioned by the British shipping company, Wh…
Warren Buffett: MAJOR Updates from the Berkshire Hathaway Shareholders Meeting 2023
Well, we made it everyone! I’m here in Omaha with Hamish, and just a few days ago we were lucky enough to go to the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting to get all the latest news from the man himself, Mr. Warren Buffett. And of course, the real…
Safari Live - Day 114 | National Geographic
And welcome to you from myself, Steve Falconbridge, joined by Fergus on camera. We are out in Toomer, in Sabi Sands, with degrees of 33 degrees Celsius and 89 degrees Fahrenheit. It is a nice warm day; the Sun is beating down. We have developed a bit of a…
Laws & Causes
[Music] Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Do you want to see the most illegal thing I own? It’s a penny from 2027. That’s right, it is a piece of counterfeit US currency. Or is it? There are no 2027 pennies today, which means that this is a counterfeit of an ori…
Why Capitalism is the BEST System | Kevin O'Leary
Last week, Kevin, I discussed an Oxfam report that contained a startling statistic: that the world’s richest 85 people hold precisely the same wealth as the three and a half billion poorest people. Now, if you saw the show, you won’t be surprised to hear …
Here's What $44,000,000 Buys You In Hollywood
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here! So, two months ago, we toured a 44 million dollar house, but the thing was at the time, the home was still under construction, and you couldn’t really get a good idea of what the final product would truly look like. Well,…