yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Where Is This Video?


5m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Steve Seitz and Chuck Dyer used view morphing to digitally reveal a side of the Mona Lisa we've never seen before. What it would look like if she stared directly at us. That's her, but it seems a bit unfamiliar. I mean, there is only one iconic view of the Mona Lisa. There's only one physical object you can look at to say that you saw the Mona Lisa with your own eyes.

Photographs exist. There are copies you can also look at. There are forgeries, there are parodies, but the true original Mona Lisa is in the Louvre. That's where it is. But where is this video? Seriously, where is this video? I mean, it's on your screen right now, but it's also on a lot of other screens. Where's the original? Well, it's stored on YouTube servers and the original export is on my hard drive, but those are just instructions for making the video.

This video is anywhere. Every stream, every viewing of this video is, as Bill Thompson would say, "a digital simulacrum of something that has no original". So, how does a museum curator or an archaeologist deal with this? Well, they are rethinking curating. I mean, take a look at this sculpture. "The distance from this sentence to your eye is my sculpture." That's pretty cool, but how do you put something like that in a museum?

This sculpture and this video can be endlessly copied, and every version is made out of different stuff at different times, a bit like your body. There's an identity crisis going on. As I discussed before, every few years nearly all of your atoms are replaced. Old ones leave, new ones come in. Where is the original you? Like this video, you are really just the result of a set of instructions being followed.

And in our cases, interestingly, those instructions are kind of forgeries. 'The $12 Million Stuffed Shark' is a great book about the art world. It mentions that, at one point in history, there were 600 Rembrandt's hanging in museums and 350 Rembrandt's in private collections. The only problem is Rembrandt scholars say that Rembrandt only ever made 320 paintings. Mistaken identity, forgeries, and phonies have been around for a long time.

In 1496 a young Michelangelo, the same Michelangelo that painted this, forged a statue. He treated the statue with acid to make it look not like his own work but like the work of ancient Greeks or Romans, so he could sell it for more money. But really, what's wrong with a forgery? I mean, sure, supporting forgeries is like supporting plagiarism, but as far as intrinsic aesthetic properties go, what's the difference?

Whether painted by Da Vinci, or a dog, or copied perfectly by a robot, wouldn't the Mona Lisa smile just as mysteriously and coolly? Well, here's the thing. We feel like the original, the Mona Lisa Da Vinci originally made, has an aura about it. As Richard Wiseman discussed in Quirkology—a great book—psychologist Paul Rosen once studied just how obsessed we are with relics, things important merely because of their auras.

He found that people were more willing to wear a sweater that had been dropped in dog poop than they were to wear a sweater they had been told was once owned by a mass murderer. We are influenced by auras. Right now, I am in Mougin, the city in southeastern France where Picasso died. On one occasion, Picasso refused to sign a painting he knew he had painted, saying, "I can paint a fake Picasso just like anybody else."

You can disown your own paintings, and you can disown your children, but you can claim to have created your own paintings. But can you really claim to have created your own children? Let's explore a metaphor. Your mother is a 3D printer that printed you. But hold on, your parents conceived you and curated you, cared for you. But the actual blueprints that made you were outside of their conscious control.

Your blueprint is a forgery. It has been copied, replicated over and over again, ever since the very first group of molecules were arranged in a way that automatically replicated billions and billions of years ago. It's not a perfect forgery. Changes occur every time, making successive copies a little bit different. But 99.9 percent of your DNA isn't different from anyone else's.

Now, you might say, but wait, Michael, we all look so different. Kind of. But that's also because your brain is particularly good at recognizing differences amongst things that you are familiar with. It's called the cross-race effect, and it's the reason new twins you've never met before look totally the same, until you get used to them. It's the reason people from a culture you're not used to tend to be more difficult to distinguish.

And the reason, say, a big group of black labs you've never met before all kind of look like the same black lab. We all have a common descendant, a common person our DNA has been replicated from over and over again, making us, in a funny way, a big bunch of forgeries. Go back 50 forgeries ago, 50 generations ago, and that's enough to connect every single human living on Earth.

I've said this before: you are at least 50th cousins with everyone else living on the planet today. But we can go back further than that, as Guy Murchie famously did. You see, animal populations, and even molecule populations, experience replication variation and selective pressures, which means you are trillionth cousins with all life on Earth and, technically speaking, quadrillionth cousins with water and trees and rocks.

It's a beautiful notion, but it's anything but new. The word 'human' comes from a word for soil. And compare the Hebrew word for 'ground' with their name for the first man. You are quadrillionth cousins with dirt, with rocks, with trees, with plastic, with the very clothing you are wearing right now. So whether you're fighting with a stranger in a bar or stubbing your toe on a rock, it's all just a family squabble.

And as always, thanks for watching. Oh, hey, you're still there. This is great because I have some really cool news. Vsauce was just nominated for a Webby, in the news and information category. It's a really big honor, and I want to thank you guys for making this possible. You can be a Vsaucer in a whole new way now by voting for Vsauce in the Webby's. Just follow the link at the top of this video's description.

All the nominees, by the way, are great. It's great that the universe has these channels, so check all them out. And as always, thanks for watching.

More Articles

View All
How to make INSTANT PROFIT with Real Estate
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, I understand this sounds like a very intense claim to say that you can make money immediately in real estate, especially when on this channel I preach investing in real estate is a very long-term plan. But there i…
How To Price For B2B | Startup School
[Music] Hi there, my name is Tom, and I’m a partner here at Y Combinator. Today, I’m going to be talking about one of the most common questions I get from founders, which is how to price. So, the founder’s been working on outbound sales, contacting peop…
AI in Education: Opportunities + Pitfalls
All right, welcome everyone! This is Jeremy Schiefling with Khan Academy. I am so thrilled to welcome you back for round two of our AI and education webinar series this summer. I know that this summer time is your time, and so I apologize for intruding up…
Atomic spectra | Physics | Khan Academy
We can look at stars or nebulas or even planets which are very, very far away and estimate what composes them, what are the elements that are there inside of them. But how do we do that? How can we sit here on Earth and figure out what elements are presen…
The Biggest Investing Opportunity of 2024
This video is brought to you by Seeking Alpha. Sign up with the link in the pin comment to receive a 7-Day free trial and $25 off your annual subscription of Seeking Alpha premium. The price increases to $299 on October 1st, so get $25 off and secure the …
Subtraction strategies with hundredths
About some strategies subtracting decimals that involve hundreds. So, for example, if I have 0.69 or 69 hundredths, and from that I want to subtract 0.34 or 34 hundredths, what is that going to be? Pause this video and see if you can compute this. So, t…